Cutting the Cord: The Beginning of the End for Cable Companies?

With Netflix all but eliminating video rental stores, nationwide (with an assist from Redbox), and Hulu’s presence as an online television provider, has it also begun to force cable programming companies to re-think their strategy as well?

netflix  rblogo  hulu

With HBO’s announcement last week that it would unveil a new monthly streaming subscription service, without the need of a cable TV provider, it has gotten people to ask themselves whether or not they really need cable anymore. Who can blame them? With the great original programming on Netflix, like House of Cards and Orange is the New Black, as well as up-to-date (besides the currently airing seasons) series of other popular television shows like The Walking Dead, Sons of Anarchy and The Following, it seems like a no-brainer for HBO to follow their lead and just charge a monthly subscription fee for those of us who just want to watch Game of Thrones or Boardwalk Empire every Sunday night.

According to an article on Yahoo Finance, Netflix doesn’t see HBO as a competitor looking to encroach on what they’ve created over the past several years, but rather, another player in the internet TV and movie streaming game. It’s no surprise that someone from premium cable realm is finally starting to follow suit. The only real surprise is that it’s taken this long. Few people know that Netflix was actually started in 1997, and has been going by the monthly subscription model (for physical copies of movies) with no late fees since 1999. Granted, their clout in the industry wasn’t as strong then as it is today, but it kept gaining steam. After their initial public offering (IPO) in 2002, and subsequently their online database for streaming, Netflix took off, leaving the likes of Blockbuster and their attempt at a competitive online service in the dust.

The forecasting research has been done to insist that this trend will likely continue into the future. Take a look at these graphs from the Wall Street Journal and Leichtman Research Group:

Media-decline-in-TV-channels-subscriptionMedia-TV-connected-to-internet

 

Since 2010, while there has been a decline in the number of cable channels being subscribed to, there has also been a significant incline in the amount of households that have at least one TV connected to the internet. While some may say, “those aren’t HBO, or Showtime, or another premium channel, currently you can only get those movie channels as an addition to your pre-existing cable subscription, so the decline in these very basic channels, is actually showing a decline in cable subscribers in general.

 

So, my questions to you are as follows…

Have you cut the proverbial cord in your television life, or are you just riding the wave until your hand is forced?

Is this move by HBO just the first domino to fall in the eventual elimination of cable TV as we know it today?

 

Sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/reed-hastings-netflix-bloomberg-game-changers-2011-5?op=1

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-netflix-doesn-t-consider-214814516.html

http://marketrealist.com/2014/10/netflix-influencing-subscriber-loss-media-companies/

NFL Life Cycle

After reading the product life cycle of bacon, I thought of other products that have similar product cycles. The first product that came to my mind was the product life cycle of the National Football League.

Nfllogo

The National Football League began in the late 1800s. When the NFL was in the introductory phase, the most popular form of American football was in the collegiate level. It wasn’t until the 1950s when collegiate football stars began to play in the NFL that the NFL began to gain some relevance among American spectators. In the 1960s other football leagues popped up and rivaled the NFL. These other leagues almost ended the product cycle of the NFL prematurely but the NFL persevered.

 

In the 1980s the rise of the NFL was unprecedented. It became the United States most popular spectator sport above Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association. Although it was already at the top it was still only in its growth phase. Currently the NFL is still the most spectated sport with raging fanatics and no sign of stopping. The Super Bowl is the most watched event in the United States and the National Football League is looking to expand to eighteen games and adding an expansion team in London. NFL teams are on average worth more than a billion dollars. Depending on whom you ask some people still believe that the NFL is in the growth phase. With all the success surrounding the NFL it is hard to dispute that. Although the NFL is continuing to experience all this success and continuing to try and expand there are many obstacles that could ultimately lead to their decline.

 

Recently the NFL has been portrayed negatively in the news because of the waythey handled the Ray Rice domestic assault charges. Women make up a large portion of their fan base and the way they handled the situation can only negatively affect it. The NFL also faces criticism because of the way they handle player safety. They have received strong criticism for not having a stronger concussion protocol and because for a while they neglected to acknowledge the damaging effects of concussions. Many parents are worried that concussions can really negatively affect their child’s life and are not letting their kids play football anymore. The reason the NFL is so popular is because they have very talented athletically gifted players. A decrease of children playing football can negatively affect athlete pool available for NFL teams, which could make NFL games less exciting.

 

Although there are many criticisms once the NFL season starts those are pushed aside and all people care about is their teams’ chances of making the playoffs. Do you believe the NFL will lose popularity and enter its decline phase if they continue to face more of these criticisms? Do you think expanding is a good idea even though player safety is a very major concern and will that have any effect? 

http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/CFL_NFL_NFL_History.htm

iPad mini 3 is skating on thin ice

The iPad Mini could soon be obsolete due to the new and exciting iPhone 6 plus. Apple users have been waiting for a phone that could match the size of the current Androids in the market. However, the arrival of the iPhone 6 plus has impacted the future of the iPad mini. Although, Apple has just released the new and improved iPad mini 3, this does not mean that there will one day be a fourth.

Sales
Apple is in the business of making money just like everyone else. According to Motley Fool of Nasdaq.com, “Apple’s iPad sales have suddenly declined in the past two quarters after phenomenal growth in the first four years of the product category’s life.” Customers were originally purchasing the iPad due to its large screen size and favorable portability versus a laptop. Since phones have increased in screen size, customers have been purchasing these phones and leaving their iPads at home. The fact that iPad sales have declined in the past two quarters is something that Apple will take note of and forecast for in the future.

Product Life Cycle
In my opinion, I would say that the iPad mini is just entering the decline stage of the product life cycle. New iPad minis are lacking product differentiation. Apple has released the iPad Air and I strongly believe that this will be the future for Apple as far as tablet computing goes. Additionally, iPad sales have declined and releasing an iPhone 6 plus close to the size of an iPad mini will only discourage customers to purchase the iPad mini since the iPhone 6 plus has comparable size. The iPad Air is a much larger tablet than the iPad Mini and this gives it a huge size advantage over the iPhone 6 plus.

iphone 6 plus ipad mini 3

Performance
The iPhone 6 plus actually has a faster A8 processing chip while the iPad mini 3 has an A7 processing chip. This means that the iPhone 6 plus will run faster and more efficient. The iPhone 6 plus is also equipped with the M8 motion coprocessor, which is much superior to the M7 motion coprocessor of the iPad mini 3. The iPhone 6 plus has to take the edge as far as performance goes due to its upgraded specifications.

Operations
Since sales are declining for iPads, Apple will have to adjust their inventory and forecasts for the future to make sure they are not making too many. We learned in class that having excess product and not enough demand is a huge negative for a company. Finally, Apple will have to make the decision on whether or not to discontinue the iPad mini depending on what stage of the product life cycle it is in.

Some questions to think about:

  1. Would you rather use an iPhone 6 plus over an iPad mini 3?
  2. What stage of the product life cycle do you think the iPad mini 3 is in?
  3. Should Apple discontinue the iPad mini 3?

Sources:

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/the-ipad-minis-days-may-be-numbered-cm404777

http://www.cnet.com/news/why-i-prefer-the-iphone-6-over-the-6-plus-apps/

http://www.apple.com/

http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2014/10/18/will-the-apple-iphone-6-plus-kill-the-ipad-mini-3.aspx

http://www.gottabemobile.com/2014/10/04/can-iphone-6-plus-replace-your-ipad-mini-with-retina/

 

 

The Deep “Down” Dark truth behind the Feather Plucking Business

 

The North face is a popular American outdoor product company that specializes mostly in winter gear such as coats, jackets, fleece, hats, gloves, etc. It is a well-known and respected brand, yet recently it has been facing some ethical challenges in their operations. There has been a lot of controversy over down insulation. Down insulation is used due to the benefits it has of providing warmth during extreme cold weather. Yet the process of collecting these feathers is not so nice and simple. Basically many of the ducks and geese are often plucked alive, and “many of the fine feathers in comforters and puffy coats come from birds that were force-fed to make foie gras” (Stock). The North Face is one of the brands to recognize this problem in their supply chain and their goal is to create one that all customers can have a positive thought of. This relates back to our class since we discussed some of the new challenges that operations managers face, such as the increasing global focus, ethical, social responsibility and sustainability challenges. Basically companies are expected to develop products that are of high quality and sustainability. This could be seen in the actions North face is taking by changing their operations into something much more ethical, sustainable that affects everyone around the world. In the article it states, “We’re trying to change the down industry on a global level,” says Adam Mott, director of sustainability at North Face, a unit of apparel conglomerate VF Corp. “And we’re trying to create a standard that’s inclusive enough that anyone can use it”(Stock). Northface is changing its certification standard to become more environmentally focused, the birds that the feathers come from cannot be raised in harsh conditions. They need appropriate food, water and living conditions. Northface is going to have this supply chain documented clearly so that only qualified feathers will be turned into down insulation in their products. By next year a lot of products will be labeled with “RDS” which stands for “renewable down standard”. Recently a lot of other companies such as H&M, Eddie Bauer and Marmot have caught on with this major change, while Patagonia has been having clean down program for over six years. Yet the biggest challenge companies such as the Northface have to face is to convince duck and goose farmers in China and Eastern Europe, who provide most of the feathers, to change their operations and become environmentally focused, since most of the money they make, comes from meat of the birds and not the feathers. Even though there are still many obstacles along the way, Northface is following a new more sustainable path through it’s RDS program that they hope will raise consumer interest and allow them to compete with their biggest rival Patagonia.

Stock, Kyle. “North Face and H&M Try to Clean Up the Down Business.” Bloomberg Business Week. Bloomberg, 20 Oct. 2014. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.

 http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-10-20/north-face-and-h-and-m-try-to-clean-up-the-down-business

Do you think there are other challenges that operations managers of companies such as Northface are going to face?

Do you think by refocusing its ethical approach to down insulation and creating new standards will benefit Northface as a Company? Will the sales and consume interest increase, even though Northface will be competing with sustainable brands like Patagonia who have their own clean down program (PDF) as early as 2007?

Modern Marvel

Marvel Studios has successfully managed to create a universe on screen that millions of people have been craving to visually experience since 1940. With the utmost secrecy, Marvel Studios has planned out 2 phases of Super Hero flicks into the future and they hope to create an abundance of unified story telling for many years to come.

The after credits sequence, although now synonymous, with this particular movie genre was not really a thing until the world got to see the end of Iron Man. In Iron Man we were revealed Samuel Jackson in a black trench coat and an eye patch; whom the die hard fans understood was Nick Cage the leader of S.H.I.E.L.D. otherwise known as the man to unite The Avengers. This was the quintessential moment in defining what Marvel was planning to do and how they were deciding to manage their properties. This was a huge leap when it came to the movie business as we’ve never seen an intertwining of such hugely successful properties before.

All of these plans are based in secrecy as the blogs are a huge element to the hype and criticism of each Marvel film released to the public. With the giant enthusiasm by fans breeds very high expectations for film creators. The strategy for Marvel is to find the best talent in the business in order to appease the vision all fans have shared of visual spectacles with heart.

Marvel strategically reveals their plans for the future by way of Comic Con as extremely eager comic books fans await to see if their favorite super hero will be played by the caliber of actor they desire or if the film will be in the right hands of a suitable director. They often listen to fan opinion in the blogs when it comes to their hiring choices and are highly motivated by fan desires. This relationship between the studio and their audience is fairly unique as Marvel relies on anticipation for much of their success. Blogs, big reveals from comic conventions, events in the comic books, and after credit scenes add fuel to the immense burning fire Marvel Studios masterfully sustains.

POSTER FOR AVENGERS II: AGE OF ULTRON

http://www.mtv.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/avengers-age-of-ultron-collage.jpg

Kevin Feige, the architect of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and Marvel Studios have had immense success. Avengers alone gained $1.5 Billion worldwide (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?view=main&id=marvelcomics.htm&sort=studio&order=ASC&p=.htm) and Avengers II: Age of Ultron is expected to surpass that with the incredible amount of anticipation behind the upcoming film. The studio has crafted a sophisticated formula to build an audience even before the trailer for the movie is released and we can all see it’s paying off.

There are clearly a lot people invested in the planning of this cinematic universe; from the fans to those behind the scenes creating the film. Knowing this, do you believe the super hero genre is here to stay? Why/Why not?

Marvel Studios is creating programs for Netflix featuring heroes like Daredevil and Luke Cage; would you like to see the Marvel Cinematic Universe continue to expand or do you feel there is a ceiling to the genre?

 

http://www.wired.com/2013/08/kevin-feige-marvel-dc-movies/all/

The ‘Walmarting’ of the Airline Industry

Norwegian Air Shuttle’s ambitious plans involve some complex logistics
Norwegian Air Shuttle’s ambitious plans involve some complex logistics

Many companies choose to employ a global strategy where different pieces of the process are completed in different regions of the world. These global processes can be accomplished in numerous combinations and it is up to the company to find the most effective one.

In this article, Norwegian Air Shuttle, an airline that specializes in low-cost flights around Europe, is bringing it business model to the United States and Asia, to the dismay of U.S. airline companies.

Their strategy is a complex one that has different cost-effective parts. Norwegian is “moving its long-haul operations from Norway to Ireland, basing some of its pilots and crew in Bangkok, hiring flight attendants in the United States, and flying the most advanced jetliner in service — the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.” Other airlines have tried but failed to do a low-fare approach on long-haul flights.

Bjorn Kjos, Norwegian’s CEO, is confident that they can offer fares that are 50 percent cheaper than the competition’s, which will ultimately drive out competition. American Labor groups, “see it as a backhanded attempt to outsource cheaper labor and undercut competition” as well as taking advantage of the open-skies agreement made with the EU (even though Norway isn’t part of the EU).

“United Airlines and American Airlines said the low-cost airline wanted to skirt labor laws by resettling its long-haul operations in Dublin, while using a Singapore-based company to hire pilots on its behalf in Thailand. The result would give it ‘a competitive advantage on trans-Atlantic routes in direct competition with U.S. carriers.’”

In class, we talked about competitive advantages in relation to globalization. According to the lecture there are many reasons to globalize:

  1. Improve the supply chain
  2. Reduce costs
  3. Improve operations
  4. Understand markets
  5. Improve products
  6. Attract and retain global talent

I think that the way that Norwegian Air Shuttle is globalizing falls in line with these points and it is effectively improving supply chain, reducing costs, and improving operations better than their American counterparts. They improve the supply chain by finding the most beneficial process to establish their airline. They lower direct and indirect costs by eliminating unnecessary expenses and finding the cheapest way to provide labor, and reducing taxes and tariffs. They also improve operations by understanding differences in how business is handled in different countries, and using it to their advantage.

There are also strategies for competitive advantage: differentiation, cost-leadership, and response. I believe that the Norwegian Air Shuttle company is competing on cost; they are they are providing the maximum value as perceived by the customer at the lowest cost and it is creating the most demand.

Do you think that the way Norwegian Air Shuttle handles their business model is considered a strategic competitive advantage or is it an unfair advantage? Why?

Source:  Long-Haul Expansion by a Norwegian Carrier Upsets U.S. Airlines

Burger King: A Xerox machine?

By 2003, the investors of Burger King expected that the company would improve under the new management of TPG Capital since the revenues of the company were declining and this new management hoped to give it a face-lift. But unfortunately, the company took a downfall altogether. In 2008, the company advertised its “BK super seven incher” using subliminal marketing techniques but it drew anger from the customers. In order to change their image they launched another ad, with the mailman neglecting his duties to get Burger King’s “Double Crossain’wich” which received many criticism and they were sued by the USPS for its using its logo inappropriately.

Moreover, in the last 6 years Burger King has continuously reported losses. Since 2008, the company saw a decline in its sales and lost to Wendy’s as the number 2 fast food chain in the market.

In a fight to stay ahead of its competitors and boost it’s sales, Burger King has tried to copy the number one fast food chain in the market, McDonalds.

Burger King has copied a lot of McDonald menu items in the past few years including salads, fruit smoothies, chicken nuggets and wraps. To explain a little further, Burger King’s launch of “two savory 100% pure beef fire-grilled patties, freshly cut lettuce, crisp onions and signature King Sauce, all on a three-layer warm, toasted, sesame seed bun” is exactly the same as McDonald’s “two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions – on a sesame seed bun.”

In the recent months, Burger King is identifying what makes McDonald’s a success and then followed the same path. Although, I must say that Burger King had some success along the way and McDonald’s lost a lot of customers. In 2013 sales report McDonald’s sales dropped by 0.2 percent while Burger Kings sales dropped by a staggering 0.9 percent.

Burger King’s strategies have failed and have costed the organization a lot money in the past. In order to stay in the business do you think that Burger King should just follow McDonald’s success path instead of differentiating itself from its competitors?

Do you think that Burger King should rebrand itself and not to be branded as a McDonalds copycat?

How do you think that Burger King can get itself out of the slumps and become profitable once again?

Do you think that the King will survive another decade?  Two?

Kohl’s: Where you expect Great… Management?

kohls-logo

After working at Kohl’s for almost four years now, I have been able to experience several types of managers and observe which ones succeed and which ones find out they cannot handle the management life. At Kohl’s, there is a store manager, a manager for domestics (shoes, home, and seasonal), a manager for apparel, an human resources manager, and a truck/replenishment manager. Under these managers are hourly ones who have the same responsibility and power as the salary managers, but do not do as much of the office work. Along with the managers, there are “leads”. Leads are the ones who make sure each department is organized and set up correctly according to the corporate book and the managers above them. Leads, however, do not technically have a managerial role in the store, they are just in charge of the floor associates and can tell them what needs to be done.

The way that the managers at Kohl’s are tiered works out quite well part of the time. There is usually a salary manager and an hourly manager working at the same time during busy time periods to avoid one person being split up too much. One answers the manager assistance calls, the phone calls, and checks in on the department while the other does a project or office work. Along with making sure one person is not stretched out too much, the tiering helps make sure that the store’s appearance and layout is correct and appealing. A lead works on the majority of the layout with some help from an hourly manager to make the department follow the book and the department managers, plus the store manager, walk around to make sure it looks visually appealing and suggesting tweaks if necessary. This way everyone has their own project to work on when they’re at work and the customers are getting a visually appealing store along with great customer service.

However, the tiering of the managers’ responsibilities makes the floor and cashier associates very low on the totem pole. Sometimes it is unclear who we should go to when we have a question about an item or project. Other times it feels like we are very distant from our store manager because he is 85% of the time in his office doing computer work instead of interacting with us. Also, when he does come to talk to us, it is usually to tell us what we are doing wrong and ask us why we have not made the goals of the day yet even when it is very early in the day. Also, the scheduling of the managers almost always is never one that works. A majority of the time, only one manager is scheduled while they have a project and/or office work while they are supposed to be available to customers at the same time. This usually leaves the customer service interaction to suffer because the manager is stretched too thin to get to everything that needs to be attended to.

To help customer service satisfaction go up, the managers at my store tried telling us what we can and cannot do when we are at the register with customers to avoid calling a manager as much. This caused many problems in the store because of miscommunication. Our loss preventions and the store manager worked together to make a list of things that we can do for a customer without calling a manager or questioning the customer. This includes accepting expired coupons, lowering prices of products, and adjusting their previous purchases. However, they were not clear on the boundaries of these exceptions. Some managers will only allow week old coupons while others accept ones that are several months old. This variation just made us call a manager no matter what because we did not know what was accepted and what would look like a red flag to loss preventions on our associate number.

Do you think the tiering method is only good on paper? Or should there just be better communication?

 

Human vs. Robot: The Battle for the Workforce

In class we learned how increasing productivity and efficiency of process can lead to larger profits for the firm. One of the methods used to increase productivity was the incorporation of robots into the workforce. We learned that robots can be used in a variety of ways, such as milking cows, constructing cars, or transporting. With decreased cost of production and human error, robots are among the most supported guarantors of future profits. However, not everyone supports the growing use of robots in the workforce. According to the Economist, robots are the death of the lower – middle skilled workforce and the beginning of “premature deindustrialization” (The Third Great Wave, p. 4)

The terms “efficiency” and “productivity” have always been referred to positively; as efficiency in process rises, productivity rises.” Thinking this through, we define efficiency as the better use of resources, the decrease in human labor per product, and the increase in output from freed – up labor, which ultimately should result in an increase in wages. In essence, to increase productivity, efficiency has to increase; and efficiency is synonymous with less cost and more revenue. Revenue is then used to reward workers for their high productivity. It is here that the robot-human conflict comes in.

It does not take a seer to foretell the replacement of low-skill human laborers by robots. The Economist outlines that, in a correct system, as technology replaces human workers; the higher skilled workers make more money and spend more money, creating new jobs (Technology isn’t working, p. 6). However, it is no stretch of the imagination that businesses are reluctant to increase the wages of their employees, and this issue is the problem. Average human productivity increased last year at a rate of 2.5%, while wage increase lagged at 1%. This shows that, as output increased, people earned marginally less than what would have been normal. Without increased wages, people cannot spend, and without spending, there is no new creation of jobs.

Furthermore, we know that robots do not require payment for their services. And as we saw on Monday, their accuracy and precision removes the problem of human error, making them the epitome of efficiency. These facts make them a more viable solution to increasing output. As the Economist observes, COOs and managers see that robots can dramatically increase a firm’s output without having to receive payment, and so they invest in more robots (6). This results in less need for human labor, which leaves many unemployed, which ultimately leads to less sales and more inventory.

As time moves forward, technology will continue to improve. We saw this with video cassettes to DVDs to online streaming and the ipod series, and now we are seeing the workforce demography change as well. I feel that businesses have to find a balance between robot and human workers in order to maintain cash flows. I find it interesting that something so helpful in the workforce could lead to such problems, and it merits discussion.

How do you feel about robots entering the workforce? Do you really think it will be all that bad? How do you think low-skill laborers will make a living if their jobs are occupied by technology that does not need money to survive?

“The Third Great Wave.” Economist 4 Oct. 2014: 56, 58. Print.

The Rise and Fall of the iPod

Has Apple’s iPod finally reached the end of it’s product life cycle?

After its release, the iPod forever changed the way we look at mp3 players. Initially hitting the market in 2001, it became the most popular and recognizable portable music device. This can be attributed to it’s success in the introduction phase. The distinctive click wheel and white head phones that gave the iPod its iconic look and popular product design. They spent a lot on advertisement and saw minimal profit. Practically everyone had some kind of iPod growing up, and Apple was constantly renovating and improving it.

In 2001, when it was first introduced, they sold a total of 125,00 units. By 2006, they were up to 88 million iPods sold. This was when iPod really entered the growth stage. The product design began to stabilize and they continued to enhance and upgrade its ability and capacity. This was also when Apple really started to heavily advertise. The white headphones continued to be a stable of the iPod and Apple capitalized on this with advertising. This also allowed them to have customers advertise for them. Anytime you saw someone using white headphones, you knew it was an iPod without even seeing the iPod. The fact that they could have successful advertising without even showing the device was an amazing accomplishment.

ipod-people

Sales peaked in 2008, and at this point they sold over 157 million iPods. This signified the beginning of the maturity stage as sales started to slow down and stabilize. Competitors were established and ultimately realized they had little chance of competing with the iPod. Apple was also able to reduce cost and improve production. By 2010, 275 million iPods were sold. Most customers at this point are repeat buyers and want to upgrade their previous device.

In 2014, almost 13 years and 26 models later, the iPod seems like it has finally reached the end of it’s product life cycle, and is seeing the effects of the decline stage. Profits for the year are down 52% compared to this time last year, and is expected to drop even further.  On top of this Apple has greatly reduced the amount of time and money spent on enhancing and advertising. The newest iPod release was the 5th generation iPod touch, and that was in May of 2013. In 2014 they released colors for the 5th generation, but it has been over a year since the last iPod model was released, and this is the longest gap in the devices history.

Reasons for this are believed to be a result of consumers expecting more from their devices. Instead of buying a iPods, Apple consumers are buying iPhones and iPads instead.

29648456a00e0098d85558833015431f0dde0970c-800wi

Steve Jobs joked in 2007 when the iPhone was released that the iPhone was “the best iPod we’ve ever made”. I wonder if he realized how correct he was, or that the iPhone would eventually replace the iPod all together. iPhones and iPads offer the same music capabilities of the iPod, but with much more ability, including thousands of mobile apps, accessible internet, and many ways to connect and communicate.

 

Do you think the iPod will rebound or has it completed its life cycle?

What are some reasons the iPod has seen a decline in sales?

How was Apple able to create such a long and successful product life cycle? It has taken over a decade for the iPod to reach the decline stage.

 

Sources:

http://jkaonline.typepad.com/jkaonline/2011/04/apple-case-study-from-the-ipod-to-the-ipad-product-life-cycles-and-growth-potential.html

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-25927366

http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/apple/analyst-ipod-touch-final-stage-its-product-life-cycle-3407151/