KFC China: Straying too Far from Kentucky?

001372a9ae271258cd8f02

Bloomberg Business Week featured KFC, a Yum brand restaurant, in two recent articles focusing on the brands Chinese storefronts. KFC, a household name in US fast food chains, has been suffering in several different aspects. Originally tied with the name “Kentucky Fried Chicken”, KFC has evoked feelings of unhealthiness with US consumers for years, and has suffered sluggish sales. However, the chains crowning glory has been KFC China which has been a start for Yum brands and been increasingly profitable.

Recently, however, KFC China has suffered from image issues and quality problems, and therefore there sales in China have been dipping. For KFC in the past, unhealthiness was not as much of an issue for its Chinese counterpart, because it brought a unique competitive advantage: its traditional American menu. KFC China took a different approach that may have ruined that competitive advantage, by trying to adapt the menu to the Chinese audience and adding traditional Chinese fare. So far it appears that this was not a wise choice, and consumers are left wondering what happened to their beloved American food. KFC needs to reassess their product design to match the wants of the Chinese customer base.

On top of this reconstructed image issue for KFC China, what may have been even more damaging was quality control issues. A history of poor quality issues can be severely damaging to a brand, especially one associated with the food industry. Consumers take extra precautions with what they are putting into their bodies, so when news of KFC chicken containing “unacceptably high levels of antibiotics” the chain suffered. This on top of already high concerns dealing with avian flu, made Chinese consumers even more skeptical about consuming this product. This illustrates, how damaging a quality issue can be for a brand, as discussed in Chapter six.

KFC China had been so successful in the past, that Yum has considered completely selling the United States stores in order to focus on those abroad that were growing at a much faster rate. However, if they continue to have these image and quality issues in China, getting rid of US stores may be a poor choice.  If KFC abandons its US stores, does that destroy its image of being a classic American restaurant even further? Only time will tell what happens to this brand, but it is crucial that Yum and KFC managers assess this project.

What are your thoughts on KFC and KFC China?

Questions for discussion:

1. Should KFC focus on one brand or the other? Or continue with both?

2. How should a major fast food brand adapt to international markets? Maintain their original image, or add traditional food, specific to the location?

3. Where to you see Yum and KFC moving in the future?

Article Links:

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-16/kfc-loses-its-touch-in-china-its-biggest-overseas-market

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-14/should-kfc-rethink-its-china-strategy

 

Changing the Game in Prescription Drugs: Walgreens and AmerisourceBergen

In March of this year, Walgreens and AmerisourceBergen announced a partnership to take over part of Walgreens prescription drug distribution. This partnership will give both companies a leverage in size and help them better compete in the already large industry. President Obama’s Affordable Care Act will extend health care coverage to a lot of people who previously did not have it. For the pharmaceutical industry, this means a lot, and companies will be fighting to keep prices low. “To win, companies must capture enough new volume to offset the effect of pricing pressure on profit margins” (Cahill).

The news of this merger is very relevant to Operations Management, because of the changes it will mean for Walgreens supply chain. Previously, Walgreens had used Cardinal Health Inc. for some of their distribution needs, but not nearly to the extent of the new AmerisourceBergen partnership. However, the contract Walgreens had with Cardinal is up in August, and they will be using this opportunity to change how they run their distribution. For Cardinal, their stock price has already been falling.

In a quote from Crain’s Chicago Business, author Joe Cahill sums up what this means for Walgreens supply chain: ”Walgreen’s agreement to buy $28 billion worth of drugs annually from AmerisourceBergen will pump more volume through the wholesaler’s distribution network, boosting asset utilization and profitability. At the same time, wholesale costs should fall as the bulked-up middleman leans on suppliers.”

One of the main reasons for the merger, besides the cost-cutting, is their new-found access to specialty drugs. The company that has been known for their bulk prescriptions, is now able to sell drugs for, “cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, which have higher profit margins but are also more expensive to keep on hand” (Humer and Wohl). Previously, Walgreens was not able to supply all of these drugs because their delivery trucks came from Cardinal only once a week. Now Walgreeens will be receiving daily deliveries from AmerisourceBergen (Japsen).

This partnership does not only mean new things for Walgreens, but AmerisourceBergen as well. This contract will be worth $400 billion over the ten years that it is in effect. It is becoming increasingly more difficult for small companies to compete in this economy for this type of industry. This partnership really allows Amerisource Bergen to focus their efforts on, “generic and branded prescription drugs around the world” (Japsen). Being able to concentrate their efforts in specific areas, allows AmerisourceBergen for further cost-cutting

Thoughts for discussion:

Do you think rival CVS/Caremark will begin to change or rethink their distribution after this news?

What does this mean for other pharmaceutical companies? Are the industry giants, the only real players now?

Will other companies take note of Walgreens change in supply change?

Sources: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20130323/ISSUE10/303239984/the-one-word-reason-for-walgreens-amerisourcebergen-deal#ixzz2RocEDyrl

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2013/03/19/walgreens-amerisourcebergen-play-creates-worlds-largest-drug-buyer/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/20/us-amerisourcebergen-walgreens-idUSBRE92I0EP20130320